So, these folks want the government to take control of their (and your, and my) healthcare. They want to give the government power over the most important and most personal choices.

An then when the government decides to use that power because of political pressure, they get upset.

The inclusion of Rep. Bart Stupak’s restrictive abortion amendment in the bill has prompted well-established abortion-rights groups to oppose the entire House bill, and it is drawing the ire of feminist bloggers and activists. Pro-abortion rights members of Congress are also attempting to derail the final passage of any bill that includes the Stupak amendment. Yet as the Democrats’ reform package teeters between success and failure — with just a few more votes needed to kill the bill — it remains to be seen whether leaders will risk stripping out the amendment, which was added to win over conservative Democrats.

The Stupak amendment passed on the House floor Saturday with the support of 64 Democrats — of whom 62 were men, liberal bloggers have been quick to point out.

The provision would prevent women who receive subsidies to purchase insurance that covers abortion — inside or outside of the proposed national health insurance exchange. It would also explicitly ban abortion coverage from the government-run plan, or “public option.” While it does not explicitly prohibit private plans on the exchange from offering abortion coverage, insurers would have little incentive to offer abortion coverage, since most customers on the exchange would pay with subsidies.

“Abortion is a matter of conscience on both sides of the debate,” said Rep. Rosa DeLauro (D-Conn.). “This amendment takes away that same freedom of conscience from America’s women. It prohibits them from access to an abortion even if they pay for it with their own money. It invades women’s personal decisions.”

I hate to break this to you, but the entire bill invades women’s personal decisions. Are you really this stupid? Really?

Of course, the row does give some of us hope that nothing will pass.

Reps. Diana DeGette (D-Colo.) and Louise M. Slaughter (D-N.Y.) released the text of a letter today to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi that says, “We will not vote for a conference report that contains language that restricts women’s right to choose any further than current law.”

The congresswomen claim to have more than 40 signatures collected for the letter so far, though the signatures have not yet been released.

Meanwhile, abortion-rights groups are stepping up to pressure President Obama and the Senate to keep the measure out of the final health care bill. The National Organization for Women held a rally at the Capitol today in opposition to the amendment and is fundraising to lobby on the issue. The group opposes the entire House health care bill because of the amendment.

“We cannot and will not support a health care bill that strips millions of women of their existing access to abortion,” NOW President Terry O’Neill said in a statement. “NOW calls on the Senate to pass a health care bill that respects women’s constitutionally protected right to abortion and calls on President Obama to refuse to sign any health care bill that restricts women’s access to affordable, quality reproductive health care.”

I guess they are blind to the irony.


About Paul Stagg

Husband, lifter, MBA in Baltimore, MD. Will post about Powerlifting, politics, Classical Liberalism, Economics, building wealth, self improvement, productivity, heavy music, wine, food, beer, and almost anything else. View all posts by Paul Stagg

5 responses to “Irony?

  • one of these folks?

    When you say “these folks want the government to take control of their (and your, and my) healthcare”, which folks are you talking about in particular?

    Surely you aren’t speaking sloppily, acting as if anyone who supports reform such as a public option are in fact supporting a single payer system?

  • Paul Stagg

    I think I’m pretty clear, bt I’m primarily referring to those mentioned in the article (NOW); those who support the house bill.

  • one of these folks?

    Okay, so you think that the House bill is a government takeover of all of our healthcare? How does that square with what the bill actually says? As far as I’ve heard it doesn’t put forward a single payer system. Which means it doesn’t take over MY healthcare, at least. I like my private plan very much and was planning on keeping it private… if there’s something in the bill that will take it over, I’d appreciate it if you could quote me chapter and verse. Because that WOULD be a matter of concern, and I’d want to know.

  • Paul Stagg

    I think you’ve missed the point of the post, which is pointing out the irony of people getting upset when the government does exactly what they wanted.

    Under the house bill, you can keep your current coverage as long as it meets Federal standards. If not, you lose it, and you will be forced into the government run insuarance exchange program (where your abortion would not be covered).

    You are not allowed to change your insurance plan. So if you get a new job or start your own company, you will go into the government run exchange.

    The exchange will be heavily subsidised, thus making it more difficult for your current insurer to compete. Your current insurer will also face additional costs to comply with new government requirements on what they can charge and what they must cover.

    There are huge implications of the fines charged to companies who do not pay for 72% of the cost of their employees coverage; the main issue is the fines/penalties will cost less than buying insurance, thus putting those employees in the, you guessed it, government run exchange.

    I, like you, plan on keeping my insurance private, but I have the means to do so. Most people don’t. The long term result of this bill would be the elimination of all insurance that isn’t part of the exchange.

  • Good stuff « Paul Stagg

    […] will stop thinking ‘their guy’ can take government power and make it all right (see the irony in healthcare). Trust me, you are not going to be happy when Sarah Palin is running your […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: