I’m not sure if folks are confused, or if they are hypocrites, although I lean towards the former. I like to believe the best of people.
How can anyone who says they believe the Constitution of the United States is the foundation of the laws and limits on government power also believe that placing someone in quarantine without a warrant or court order?
And, for the other side, if a Democrat had locked up the nurse, you would be silent. How do I know? Because you’re silent about Guantanamo Bay and drone assassinations. Thing is, you shouldn’t be surprised, as this is the sort of government power you support. As long as it isn’t used against a nurse. Or something.
A refresher, in the event I’m right, and it’s just confusion:
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.
For anyone having difficulty, that says you can not deprive a person of their liberty without due process. PERIOD.