In the last few weeks I’ve shown twenty properties as a buyer’s agent.
Two listing agents followed up with me afterward looking for real feedback.
Two.
I provided feedback for one of these houses through an automated form noting that the property was in poor enough condition that it probably shouldn’t be on the market. I never heard back from the listing agent. Not a call. Not an email. Nothing.
I’m not sharing this to criticize anyone specifically. I’m sharing it because it reveals something important about how a significant portion of this industry operates, and because sellers choosing a listing agent deserve to know about it.
After every showing, there is information in the market about how buyers are responding to your property.
What they noticed when they walked in. Where their interest broke down. What the price feels like given what they saw. Whether something about the condition or the layout is creating resistance that a simple fix might resolve.
That information exists. It’s sitting with the buyer’s agent who just walked through. In most cases, nobody collects it.
The automated feedback form is not a follow-up strategy. It is a checkbox. The seller who receives three checkbox responses after a week of showings knows approximately nothing more about how their property is landing than they did before those showings happened.
What Follow-Up Actually Reveals
An agent who doesn’t follow up after showings is almost certainly not following up in the rest of their business either.
Follow-up is a habit. It is either present across the board or it isn’t. The agent who doesn’t call the buyer’s agent after a showing probably isn’t calling their past clients. Probably isn’t circling back to the buyer who went quiet three weeks ago. Probably isn’t doing the unglamorous work that happens between the visible moments of a transaction.
That in-between space is where the quality of representation actually lives. It’s where problems get caught early or discovered late. Where a client feels supported or abandoned. Where market intelligence gets gathered or ignored.
Follow-up is what fills that space. Its absence is what creates the gap that too many buyers and sellers recognize only in retrospect.
When I have a listing and a showing gets scheduled, two calls happen.
The first is before the showing. I call the buyer’s agent to introduce myself and understand their client’s situation. Five minutes. It changes the dynamic of everything that follows, because the buyer’s agent knows they’re dealing with someone who is engaged, and that tends to produce more candid feedback afterward.
The second is after. A real conversation about what the buyer saw, how they responded, and where their interest broke down. That conversation is where the market intelligence lives. I bring it back to my sellers because they deserve to know how their property is landing with buyers who are actually walking through it.
It shows up in days on market that accumulated while feedback sat uncollected. In price reductions that might have been avoided if the seller had known sooner what buyers were actually saying. In buyers who moved on because their agent never heard back and assumed the seller wasn’t motivated.
It shows up in sellers who finished the transaction feeling vaguely unsupported. Who couldn’t point to a specific failure, but who sensed throughout the process that something was missing.
That feeling has a name. It is the feeling of working with someone who follows up, or someone who doesn’t.
Before you hire a real estate agent, ask them what their follow-up process looks like after a showing. Ask how they collect feedback, how they communicate it, and how they use it to make decisions.
Listen to how specifically they answer.
An agent who actually does this will describe it in concrete terms. An agent who doesn’t will give you something that sounds reasonable but doesn’t add up to much.
That answer will tell you more about how they’ll represent you than almost anything else you could ask.

Leave a comment